RedPillsAndRabbitHoles
@RdPillsRbtHoles
·
6d
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the need for an independent review of the COVID-19 pandemic response, comparing it to the 9/11 Commission. It critiques the idea of a commission and suggests Congress is incapable of conducting such a review, indicating a call for accountability and learning from past events.
- The use of the term 'bullshit' is harsh and could be seen as harmful, reducing the statement's adherence to doing no harm with words. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the use of strong language could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding and learning from the pandemic, aligning with the principle of promoting empathy and compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement critiques the idea of a commission without engaging in personal attacks, adhering to constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses free speech to discuss public accountability, aligning with responsible use of a platform. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.