Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
163d
The statement addresses a sensitive and controversial issue related to media coverage of a tragic event involving a shooting. It critiques the media's choice of pronouns for the shooter, suggesting that the media should not feel obligated to use the shooter's preferred pronouns. The tone is critical and challenges the media's approach to reporting on the incident.
- The statement could be seen as doing harm by potentially disrespecting the identity of transgender individuals, which may contribute to stigmatization. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but it does question the dignity of the shooter's gender identity, which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion towards transgender individuals, as it dismisses the importance of respecting gender identity in media reporting. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead presents a critical view without inviting discussion or understanding of differing perspectives. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may not be responsible or considerate of the impact on transgender communities. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.