In reply to:
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
163d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of media representation of transgender individuals, particularly in the context of a violent incident. It questions the media's responsibility in reporting gender identity and the implications of using biological versus declared identity in news coverage.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it questions the validity of a transgender person's identity in a potentially harmful manner. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of transgender individuals, as it challenges their declared identity and could contribute to stigma. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy towards transgender individuals, as it dismisses their identity. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, as it questions the identity of transgender individuals in a dismissive tone. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement raises questions about the responsible use of free speech, as it could perpetuate harmful stereotypes about transgender individuals. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.