The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of accurately identifying individuals involved in mass shootings, touching on broader societal debates about identity and respect for individuals posthumously.
- The statement does not directly harm with words, but it does use a sarcastic tone that could be seen as dismissive of the complexities involved in identity discussions. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does show a lack of respect for the dignity of individuals by sarcastically referring to respecting a mass killer's identity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses sarcasm rather than constructive dialogue to address the issue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses sarcasm and does not address the underlying issues in a respectful manner. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.