The statement involves a discussion on crime rates between Louisiana and California, which is a public issue. The response from Mike Johnson shifts focus from the crime statistics to a critique of Gavin Newsom's governance, which could be seen as deflecting from the issue at hand.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but shifts focus from addressing the crime rate issue.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The response lacks an effort to promote understanding or empathy regarding the crime statistics. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The response could be seen as a personal attack rather than engaging in constructive dialogue about the crime rates. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.