Matt Taibbi

Rank 34 of 47
|
Score -46

The statement is critical and dismissive of new flag proposals, using humor and sarcasm. It expresses frustration with perceived excessive sensitivity and political correctness. The tone is mocking and somewhat confrontational.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses humor that could be seen as mocking, potentially causing harm to those who support the flag changes. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of those who may feel strongly about the flag changes, using dismissive language. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, instead ridiculing the opposing viewpoint. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in personal attacks, referring to 'pseudo-Marxist year-zero wankitude,' which is not constructive criticism. [-1]