The statement presents a comparison between two approaches to brain technology, one by Sam Altman and another by Neuralink. It invites public engagement by asking for preferences, which can contribute to discussions on technological advancements and ethical considerations in brain modulation.
- The statement does not cause harm and neutrally presents two technological approaches. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By asking for preferences, it encourages understanding and dialogue about different technological methods. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement invites constructive dialogue by asking for opinions without attacking any party. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses free speech responsibly by fostering a discussion on technological approaches. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.