In reply to:
🏛 Aristophanes 🏛
@Aristos_Revenge
·
14d
Oilfield Rando
@Oilfield_Rando
·
15d
The statement 'I agree' in response to a call for banning non-native Americans from becoming judges engages in public discourse as it touches on immigration and judicial qualifications, which are public issues. The statement implicitly supports a discriminatory stance, potentially violating principles of respect and empathy.
- The statement supports a discriminatory policy, which could cause harm to individuals based on their birthplace. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not respect the dignity of individuals who are not born in America, potentially engaging in exclusionary rhetoric. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks empathy and understanding towards immigrants and their contributions to society. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.