Steve Scalise

Rank 22 of 47
|
Score 41

The statement expresses gratitude for the opening of a new ICE detention facility, framing it as a measure to enhance public safety by detaining 'violent criminal illegal aliens.' The tone is supportive of the policy and appreciative of the government officials involved. It touches on public discourse by addressing immigration enforcement and public safety.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could be seen as doing harm by using charged language like 'violent criminal illegal aliens,' which may perpetuate negative stereotypes and stigmatize a group of people. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of individuals by labeling them in a potentially derogatory manner, which could be considered a form of hate speech. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on criminality and does not acknowledge the complexities of immigration issues. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it does not address potential concerns or opposing viewpoints about the detention facility. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to support a policy that is controversial and may not be seen as bettering society by all, as it does not consider the broader implications of detention facilities. [-1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech but could be seen as lacking responsibility and integrity by not addressing the nuances of the issue. [-1]