The statement expresses approval of a federal judge's decision to reverse funding cuts to Harvard University by the Trump administration. It frames the decision as a victory for students and the research conducted at Harvard, while criticizing the perceived intimidation tactics of the administration.
- The statement does not use harmful language and supports a decision that is portrayed as beneficial to students and research. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does criticize the actions of a public figure. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting the importance of research and education. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement criticizes the actions of the Trump administration but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to advocate for the betterment of society by supporting educational and research institutions. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by expressing an opinion on a public issue responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.