Reposted by Justin Batt
The statement questions a public figure, Pastor Steven Furtick, about his silence on a specific issue, comparing it to his previous engagement with another public issue. It challenges the pastor's consistency in addressing societal concerns, thus engaging in public discourse.
- The statement does not directly harm with words but implies a critique of inaction, which can be seen as a form of accountability rather than harm.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on public actions and not engaging in harassment or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding by questioning the inconsistency in addressing public issues, encouraging empathy for all victims. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the actions of a public figure without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to hold a public figure accountable, potentially encouraging societal betterment by advocating for consistent advocacy. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly questioning a public figure's actions in a public forum. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.