The statement addresses public issues related to crime policies and media coverage, using a tragic event to criticize political policies and media behavior. The tone is accusatory and emotionally charged, aiming to highlight perceived failures in the justice system and media bias.
- The statement uses strong language that could be considered harmful, particularly by labeling an individual as a 'monster,' which may not align with striving to do no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of the accused individual, using derogatory language that could be seen as a form of harassment. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on blame and criticism rather than fostering dialogue or solutions. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses accusatory language and does not provide a platform for discussion or alternative viewpoints. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to criticize political policies and media, which could be seen as an attempt to influence public opinion, but it does so in a divisive manner. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may not be responsible or uphold integrity, as it uses emotionally charged language and lacks a balanced perspective. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.