Reposted by Steve Scalise
The statement addresses a legislative proposal regarding the treatment of 18-24-year-olds in the criminal justice system, which is a public issue. The tone is assertive, emphasizing 'common sense' and aiming to influence policy change. It suggests a shift in how young adults are sentenced in DC, advocating for them to be treated as adults rather than juveniles.
- The statement aims to address public safety, which aligns with doing no harm, but it could be seen as lacking nuance in understanding the complexities of juvenile sentencing.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote empathy or understanding for the complexities of young adult development and criminal behavior. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement is assertive and does not engage in personal attacks, but it lacks constructive dialogue with opposing views. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for a policy change, aiming to improve public safety. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.