In reply to:
The statement discusses the alleged suppression of a public figure's account on a social media platform, touching on issues of censorship and free speech. It implies a critique of the platform's moderation policies, suggesting bias against certain viewpoints.
- The statement does not directly harm but raises concerns about potential harm through censorship.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy but questions the dignity of the platform's actions.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- Engages in criticism of the platform's policies without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- Uses influence to highlight perceived issues with social media moderation. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- Addresses free speech concerns, questioning the integrity of platform policies. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.