The statement discusses the decision-making process regarding account suspensions on social media platforms, comparing it to a previous incident involving Mike Bloomberg. It highlights the complexity of enforcing policies against deceptive practices while considering the genuine nature of some posts. The tone is analytical, focusing on policy enforcement and fairness.
- The statement strives to do no harm by considering the fairness of suspensions and opting for warnings first. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy and dignity by not engaging in personal attacks and focusing on policy violations. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by analyzing the situation and comparing it to past incidents without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.