The statement engages in a discussion about journalistic practices and the timing of story development, in response to a conversation about media actions and free speech. It questions the assumptions about how stories are developed and implies a critique of the timing and motivations behind journalistic work.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not directly cause harm but questions the process behind story development, which could be seen as a critique rather than harmful.
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on journalistic processes rather than personal attacks.
[+1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the assumptions about story development, without resorting to personal attacks.
[+1]