In reply to:
pot club crime machine
@Rawbub
·
70d
The statement is part of a conversation about the separation of an artist's personal beliefs from their work, specifically referencing Arthur Conan Doyle and his views on Mormons. It questions whether a book should be judged based on the author's personal beliefs, engaging in a broader discussion about art and morality.
- The statement does not cause harm and is part of a broader discussion about literature and personal beliefs. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on a literary work rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by questioning the criteria for judging a book, encouraging a discussion on the separation of art from the artist's personal life. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by questioning a point made in the conversation, without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.