Matt Taibbi

Rank 22 of 47
|
Score 30
9/13/2025, 3:37:01 AM
X
In reply to:
Capitalism is Why We Have Fascism
@Chaologistician
·
33d
@mtaibbi This is one of those takes of yours that make me think, "Why on earth did you feel that needed to be said?"
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
33d
I don’t know much about Polanski but I disagree that Woody is a monster, and my views of his movies and books are unchanged - they are brilliant and the world would be a much more depressing place without them
iconoclast
@hipster_jackass
·
33d
@mtaibbi It's a reasonable philosophical question - "how should we feel about the creative works of monstrous men?"

Woody Allen and Roman Polanski come to mind.

The statement is part of a broader public discourse about the separation of an artist's personal life from their work, specifically in the context of controversial figures like Woody Allen and Roman Polanski. The conversation involves opinions on whether personal actions should affect the perception of their creative works.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm, but it is part of a conversation that could be sensitive to some individuals.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it is part of a discussion that could potentially touch on sensitive topics.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is a defensive response rather than a constructive contribution to the dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it is a defensive retort rather than an attempt to understand or engage with differing opinions. [-1]