Rep. Thomas Beach
@ThomasBeach
·
3d
The statement criticizes Clemson University's leadership and suggests defunding the university due to perceived inaction against 'woke' individuals. It reflects a strong opinion on university policies and leadership decisions.
- The statement's aggressive tone and call for defunding may contribute to harm rather than constructive dialogue. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement lacks respect for the privacy and dignity of individuals, using 'woke' as a pejorative term. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism and instead uses personal attacks and ad hominem arguments. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The call to defund the university does not align with using influence for societal betterment, as it could harm educational opportunities. [-2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.