In reply to:
The Real Founders
@RealForeFathers
·
27d
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
27d
The statement expresses frustration about perceived suppression on a social media platform, suggesting a bias against certain viewpoints. It implies a critique of the platform's handling of free speech and suppression, particularly in relation to political discourse.
- The statement does not directly harm others but expresses a personal grievance about suppression.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy but hints at a broader issue of platform bias, which could be seen as a form of harassment if true.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks constructive dialogue and instead focuses on personal frustration. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- It attempts to highlight an issue of public concern regarding free speech and platform bias. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.