Ron DeSantis

Rank 24 of 47

Score 24

@aaron_rice75 @KatMentel A core responsibility of citizenship is to reject spoon-fed media narratives and think for yourself. The more people do this the less influence the media has. But there are some who simply accept these narratives at face value.

9/17/2025, 3:15:17 AM

In reply to:

AFT555

@aaron_rice75

@RonDeSantis @KatMentel Because they know their audience believes them or at least wants to.

Ron DeSantis

@RonDeSantis

@KatMentel Media always seems to outdo itself. You’d think they would course correct given the ruined credibility over the years but legacy outlets just keep digging the hole deeper.

Kat Mentel ✝

@KatMentel

@RonDeSantis The past few days have opened my eyes. I knew the mainstream media were liars and now they stay silent about cold blooded murder. God help us.

Ron DeSantis

@RonDeSantis

Legacy media in all its glory…

Curtis Houck

@CurtisHouck

DISGUSTING: ABC’s Matt Gutman says he’s not sure “if we have seen an alleged murder with such specific text messages” that were “very touching, in a way, that I think many of us didn’t expect — a very intimate portrait into this relationship between the suspect’s roommate and the

The statement encourages critical thinking and skepticism towards media narratives, suggesting that individuals should independently evaluate information rather than accepting it at face value. It implies that media influence diminishes when people think critically. The tone is critical of media but promotes personal responsibility in information consumption.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement aligns with the principle of doing no harm by advocating for independent thinking, which can lead to more informed and less manipulated public discourse. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
It promotes understanding and critical thinking, encouraging individuals to engage with information thoughtfully. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement does not engage in personal attacks but rather critiques a broader system, which aligns with constructive dialogue. [+1]