In reply to:
Bonchie
@bonchieredstate
·
127d
The statement criticizes the ADL's statistics, suggesting they are unreliable. It engages in public discourse by questioning the methodology of data related to extremist-linked deaths, which is a significant societal issue.
- The statement could be seen as harmful if it dismisses data without providing evidence, potentially undermining informed discussion. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but it dismisses the work of an organization without detailed critique.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks constructive criticism and does not engage in dialogue, instead using dismissive language. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.