Ben Scallan 🇮🇪
@Ben_Scallan
·
123d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the willingness of public figures to engage in open debate, a topic related to public dialogue and the exchange of ideas. It implies a critique of 'Leftist' figures for not participating in open debates, contrasting them with Charlie Kirk.
- The statement does not directly harm others with words, but it implies a negative judgment on a group without specific evidence, which could be seen as indirectly harmful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in criticism of 'Leftist' figures but does not provide specific examples or evidence, which could be seen as a form of generalization rather than constructive criticism. It does not engage in personal attacks but could be seen as an ad hominem argument against a group. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses free speech to critique public figures, which is a legitimate use of the platform. However, it could be more responsible by providing evidence or examples to support its claims.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.