In reply to:
M
@Mbirdman222
·
9h
Ron DeSantis
@RonDeSantis
·
10h
The statement is part of a conversation discussing the accountability of media figures and the financial implications of a show's cancellation. It reflects skepticism about the motivations behind the decision, suggesting financial losses as a reason. The tone is speculative and somewhat critical.
- The statement does not directly harm but implies criticism of media accountability.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy but engages in a public critique of media actions.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue or evidence. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.