Reposted by Steve Scalise
The statement discusses a legislative change regarding the D.C. Judicial Nomination Commission, framing it as a move to prevent the appointment of 'radical activist judges.' The tone is assertive and politically charged, aiming to convey a sense of urgency and necessity for the change.
- The statement uses charged language ('radical activist judges') which could be seen as harmful or divisive. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but uses strong language that may not respect the dignity of those it opposes. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on a political agenda. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, using a more confrontational tone. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.