In reply to:
PoIiMath
@politicalmath
·
119d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of political violence and the reliability of datasets used to discuss it. The tone is dismissive and critical, suggesting that datasets showing right-wing violence are fake and those referencing them are misguided.
- The statement could potentially cause harm by dismissing data without providing evidence, which might undermine informed discussion. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The dismissive tone may not respect the dignity of those who use or produce the datasets, potentially bordering on disrespect. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, as it dismisses opposing views without providing a reasoned argument. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.