In reply to:
Hamish McKenzie
@hamishmckenzie
·
103d
The statement 'Hamish “Oathbreaker” McKenzie' appears to be a personal attack or insult directed at Hamish McKenzie. It does not engage substantively with public issues or contribute to civic dialogue. Instead, it seems to be a response to a previous comment about app rankings and culture wars, using a derogatory term.
- The statement violates the principle of doing no harm with words, as it uses a derogatory term. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, engaging in a form of personal attack. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote constructive criticism or dialogue, instead opting for a personal insult. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.