The statement compares viewership numbers between the speaker and Jimmy Kimmel, suggesting that the speaker's content is more popular and financially efficient. The intent appears to be to highlight the speaker's success and commitment to sharing 'the truth' without financial gain.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not directly harm others, but it implies criticism of Jimmy Kimmel's performance, which could be seen as a negative comparison.
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does make a public comparison that could affect Kimmel's dignity.
[-1]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on self-promotion and comparison rather than fostering dialogue.
[-1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it presents a one-sided comparison without inviting discussion.
[-1]Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The statement uses the platform to highlight personal success, which is a responsible use of free speech, but it lacks integrity in promoting understanding or constructive dialogue.