In reply to:
Andrea Stroppa 🐺 Claudius Nero's Legion 🐺
@andst7
·
94d
The statement and image engage in public discourse by discussing the influence of media and public figures on societal violence. The original statement criticizes journalists for allegedly inciting hate and equates their responsibility to that of violent individuals. The reply, "💯," indicates strong agreement with this viewpoint.
- The statement potentially violates the principle of doing no harm by labeling journalists as 'bad professors' and attributing significant moral responsibility to them, which could incite further division. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement may not respect the privacy and dignity of journalists by making broad and negative generalizations about their role. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it frames the issue in a confrontational manner. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement lacks constructive criticism and engages in ad hominem arguments by attacking the character of journalists rather than addressing specific actions or content. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.