In reply to:
Tim Pool
@Timcast
·
93d
The statement 'Contemptible behavior by Conan' is a response to a conversation about public figures and their reactions to societal issues, specifically the suspension of a late-night host and the perceived silence on a murder. The tone is accusatory and critical, suggesting that Conan's behavior is morally objectionable.
- The statement uses strong language ('contemptible') which could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm with words. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does not respect the dignity of the person it criticizes, as it labels their behavior as 'contemptible' without further explanation. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It is a personal attack on Conan's character rather than addressing the substance of his argument or actions. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.