In reply to:
Megyn Kelly
@megynkelly
·
92d
The statement 'Good' is a supportive response to a conversation about the separation of LGB from TQ. This discussion involves public discourse as it addresses issues within the LGBTQ+ community and the formation of a new organization.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but supports a divisive stance, which could indirectly contribute to harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but may not fully respect the dignity of all involved, as it supports a separation. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks empathy and compassion towards the TQ community by endorsing a split. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue or criticism, as it simply agrees with a divisive action without further explanation. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.