Mike Johnson

Rank 40 of 47
|
Score -80

The statement criticizes House Democrats for not supporting a resolution, framing it as a failure to honor a victim of violence related to First Amendment rights. The tone is accusatory and seeks to highlight a perceived injustice.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement implies harm by accusing a group of being shameful, which may not promote constructive dialogue. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It does not respect the dignity of the individuals or group being criticized, as it labels their actions as shameful without context. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism, as it uses a strong negative label without providing a detailed argument or context. [-1]