In reply to:
End Wokeness
@EndWokeness
·
85d
The statement and reply engage in public discourse by discussing a political issue involving a public figure's comments on a voting matter. The tone of the reply suggests disagreement or criticism, but it lacks context or constructive engagement with the issue.
- The reply does not directly cause harm but may contribute to a polarized discourse.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The reply does not engage in harassment but lacks respect for the complexity of the issue.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The reply does not promote understanding or empathy, as it lacks substantive engagement. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The reply does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it is dismissive without explanation. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.