In reply to:
Skscartoon
@skscartoon
·
82d
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
·
82d
Andrew K Smith
@andrewk_smith
·
82d
The statement uses strong and accusatory language, suggesting a violent act against a 'peace emissary.' It appears to be a metaphorical response to the cartoon, which depicts a choice of violence over conversation. The tone is confrontational and implies a serious grievance.
- The statement uses inflammatory language, potentially inciting further conflict rather than promoting peace. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not respect the dignity of others, as it accuses them of murder without context. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks empathy and understanding, focusing on blame rather than dialogue. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It does not engage in constructive criticism, instead opting for a personal attack. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.