In reply to:
Graham Linehan 🎗️
@Glinner
·
1d
Leoman of the Fails
@mattbcooper
·
2664d
The statement and conversation involve a contentious discussion about gender-affirming surgery, with one party making comparisons to horror films and expressing disapproval. The tone is confrontational and dismissive, particularly towards those who disagree.
- The statement uses language that could be considered harmful by comparing individuals to 'Cronenberg-ian monsters,' which may perpetuate stigma against those undergoing gender-affirming surgery. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The conversation does not respect the dignity of individuals who choose to undergo gender-affirming surgery, potentially engaging in cyberbullying or harassment. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks empathy and understanding, using inflammatory language rather than promoting compassion. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The dialogue is not constructive, with personal attacks and dismissive responses rather than engaging in meaningful discussion. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.