Mike Johnson

Rank 40 of 47
|
Score -80

The statement highlights a political divide in voting behavior between Republicans and Democrats on resolutions condemning violence and honoring an individual. It implies criticism of Democrats for not supporting a particular resolution, suggesting a lack of unity or differing priorities.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could be seen as divisive, potentially exacerbating partisan tensions rather than promoting unity or understanding. [-1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote empathy or compassion, as it focuses on criticizing the opposing party's actions. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism of the opposing party, but it does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.