Jill Stien

Rank 37 of 47
|
Score -66

The statement questions the plausibility of an official FBI account, potentially implying skepticism or disbelief. It may be intended to provoke critical thinking or challenge official narratives.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but could contribute to distrust in official narratives.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects privacy but could be seen as indirectly questioning the integrity of an institution. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it is more focused on skepticism. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue or evidence to support its skepticism. [-1]