The statement and conversation engage in public discourse by discussing alleged censorship by Google and YouTube, and the perceived lack of response from Hollywood. The tone is critical and accusatory, suggesting a bias against certain political views and a lack of support for free speech from Hollywood.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement implies harm by accusing Hollywood of supporting censorship, which could be seen as a broad generalization.
[-1]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.It challenges the privacy and dignity of those in Hollywood by making sweeping accusations without specific evidence.
[-1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue but rather makes a blanket accusation, which could hinder understanding.
[-1]Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.The statement uses its platform to highlight an issue of public concern, but does so in a divisive manner.