The statement discusses the role of monetization in research investment, suggesting that companies prioritize projects with potential financial returns. It engages in a broader conversation about the balance between government funding and private investment in research, particularly in healthcare.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not directly cause harm but emphasizes a profit-driven approach, which may overlook non-monetizable yet beneficial research.
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.It presents a viewpoint that could foster understanding of corporate motivations in research funding, though it lacks empathy for non-profit-driven research initiatives.
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement engages in constructive dialogue by responding to a previous comment, contributing to the discussion on research funding.
[+1]