In reply to:
The statement is part of a conversation about the responsibilities and considerations of large model engineers compared to robotic engineers. It suggests that large model engineers should pay more attention to timestamps, which is a technical aspect relevant to their work. This statement engages in a discussion about professional practices and responsibilities, which can be considered a form of public discourse as it touches upon industry standards and practices.
- The statement does not cause harm and is focused on a technical aspect of engineering, suggesting a constructive approach to professional responsibilities. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by suggesting an area of improvement without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.