Mike Johnson

Rank 40 of 47
|
Score -80

The statement is a partisan comparison of Republican and Democrat approaches to a continuing resolution (CR). It uses charged language to criticize the Democratic approach, labeling it as 'dirty' and associating it with negative actions. The Republican approach is described as 'clean' and 'non-partisan.'

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses divisive language, potentially causing harm by fostering polarization. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It does not respect the dignity of others, using terms like 'illegal aliens' and 'left-wing media' in a derogatory manner. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, instead focusing on partisan attacks. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It does not engage in constructive criticism, opting for personal attacks rather than substantive dialogue. [-2]