In reply to:
Brittany Rae
@legitbrittFLA
·
45d
Ron DeSantis
@RonDeSantis
·
45d
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the potential biases of juries in high-profile legal cases, which is a public issue related to the justice system and its perceived fairness.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a lack of trust in the jury system, which could undermine public confidence. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does imply a negative stereotype about jurors in certain locations. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but rather critiques the system, which aligns with constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses free speech to express an opinion on a public issue, but it should be careful to avoid undermining trust in public institutions without evidence. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.