The statement and its surrounding conversation engage in public discourse by discussing the investigation into alleged Russian collusion in the 2016 U.S. presidential election, a significant public issue. The tone is critical of the investigation, suggesting it was an abuse of power. The intent appears to be to question the legitimacy of the investigation and its outcomes.
- The statement does not directly harm others but implies wrongdoing by the 'permanent bureaucracy,' which could be seen as harmful if unfounded. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does question the integrity of public officials involved in the investigation.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is accusatory and dismissive of the investigation's legitimacy. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it dismisses the investigation as a 'hoax' without engaging with opposing viewpoints. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but may not use the platform responsibly, as it makes serious accusations without providing evidence. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.