The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the structure and accessibility of legal education and the legal profession, which are public issues. It critiques the current system of legal education and suggests an alternative path to becoming a lawyer, which could impact public policy and societal norms.
- The statement does not use harmful language and presents an opinion on legal education reform without attacking individuals. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by suggesting an alternative to traditional legal education, which could foster empathy for those unable to afford law school. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the current legal education system without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for a potentially more inclusive legal profession, which could benefit society by making legal careers more accessible. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly discussing a public issue and suggesting a policy change. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.