Reposted by Steve Scalise
The statement constitutes public discourse as it addresses a significant public issue: the potential government shutdown and its impact on healthcare programs. The tone is accusatory and partisan, attributing blame to Democrats for the potential negative consequences of a government shutdown. The intent appears to be to criticize the Democratic Party's actions and highlight the potential harm to Medicare patients.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it uses inflammatory language to blame a political party, potentially increasing division. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but it does not respect the dignity of the opposing party by attributing malicious intent. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on blame rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses personal attacks against a political party rather than addressing the issue collaboratively. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to sway public opinion against a political party, but it does not necessarily aim for the betterment of society as it lacks a balanced perspective. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech but does not use the platform responsibly, as it prioritizes partisan blame over constructive discourse. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.