The statement discusses the creation of a new accrediting body to address perceived ideological biases in academia, suggesting a political and educational reform agenda. It implies a critique of current academic standards and practices, positioning the new body as a solution to these issues.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement aims to address perceived harm in academia by proposing a new accrediting body, but it may also contribute to polarization by framing current practices as 'ideological fads.'
[-1]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it frames the issue in a confrontational manner, potentially alienating those with differing views.
[-1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement lacks constructive dialogue, as it presents a one-sided view without engaging with opposing perspectives or offering a balanced critique.
[-1]