The statement and its context involve a discussion on educational policy, specifically the creation of a new accrediting body and its implications for higher education. The conversation reflects differing opinions on the importance of policy over spectacle in politics.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not cause harm and is part of a civil discourse on policy.
[+1]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The conversation promotes understanding by discussing the impact of policies on society.
[+1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The exchange is respectful and engages in constructive dialogue without personal attacks.
[+1]