Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement expresses strong criticism of a political event, using charged language and historical comparisons. It conveys a negative view of the actions of Trump and Netanyahu, likening them to colonial arrogance and suggesting a moral duty to oppose them. The accompanying image reinforces this comparison by juxtaposing them with historical dictators.
- The statement uses harsh language and historical comparisons that could be seen as harmful. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The comparison to historical figures may be considered disrespectful and inflammatory. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, instead using divisive language. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in personal attacks rather than constructive criticism. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.