Rupert Lowe MP
@RupertLowe10
·
34d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the societal issue of digital identification systems in the UK. It expresses a viewpoint on the implications of digital ID for personal freedom and suggests potential consequences such as its use in banking, medical access, and voting. The statement also references Central Bank Digital Currency (CDBC) as a related concern.
- The statement does not directly harm others with words or actions, but it could incite fear or concern without providing evidence, which may indirectly cause harm by spreading misinformation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It presents a one-sided view without engaging with opposing perspectives or providing a balanced analysis. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It lacks engagement with counterarguments and does not invite discussion or debate. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to rally against digital ID, which could be seen as an attempt to better society by protecting freedom. However, it does not provide a nuanced discussion of the potential benefits or drawbacks.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by expressing an opinion on a public issue. However, it could use its platform more responsibly by providing a more balanced view and evidence for its claims.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.