jeremy scahill
@jeremyscahill
·
17d
The statement critiques the peace plan proposed by Trump and Netanyahu, suggesting it is ineffective and insincere. It references a conversation about a past event where Hamas agreed to ceasefire terms, but Israel allegedly attempted to assassinate negotiators, questioning the integrity of the peace efforts.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful, particularly in the phrase 'kill the negotiators,' which could be interpreted as inflammatory or accusatory without providing evidence. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but the accusatory tone could be seen as disrespectful to the individuals involved. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on criticizing the peace plan without offering constructive alternatives or solutions. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses a dismissive tone and does not provide a platform for discussion or debate. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to critique a public issue, which could be seen as an attempt to influence public opinion, but it does so in a way that may not contribute positively to societal betterment. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be responsible or uphold integrity, given the accusatory and dismissive tone. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.